مجله علوم و صنایع غذایی ایران

مجله علوم و صنایع غذایی ایران

ارزیابی ویژگی‌های فیزیکوشیمیایی و شاخص‌های خلوص شربت چغندرقند در شرایط مختلف آبیاری

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 استادیار بخش تحقیقات فنی و مهندسی مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی آذربایجان غربی، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی،
2 محقق بخش تحقیقات فنی و مهندسی مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی آذربایجان غربی، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی،
3 دانشجوی دکتری علوم و صنایع غذایی، گروه علوم و مهندسی صنایع غذایی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه ارومیه، ارومیه، ایران
10.48311/fsct.2026.117121.82900
چکیده
پژوهش حاضر با هدف ارزیابی ویژگی‌های فیزیکوشیمیایی و شاخص‌های خلوص شربت چغندرقند تحت شرایط مختلف آبیاری انجام شد. این مطالعه با اجرای شش تیمار آبیاری متفاوت شامل ترکیب‌های مختلف فاصله خطوط کاشت و دور آبیاری (کامل و یک در میان) انجام گرفت. نمونه‌های چغندرقند برداشت شده برای تعیین پارامترهای فیزیکوشیمیایی شامل میزان پتاسیم، سدیم، ازت مضر، قلیاییت، درصد شکر، خلوص شربت و قند موجود در ملاس مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفتند. نتایج نشان داد که تیمارهای دارای فاصله خطوط 50 تا 60 سانتی‌متر و آبیاری یک در میان (I4) بیشترین میزان خلوص شربت (83–85٪) و درصد شکر (13–14٪) را ارائه نمودند (05/0>p)، در حالی که مقادیر پتاسیم، سدیم و ازت مضر نیز در این تیمارها در محدوده قابل قبول قرار داشتند. تفاوت‌های معنی‌دار بین تیمارها برای شاخص‌های خلوص شربت و درصد شکر مشاهده شد (05/0>p)، اما پارامترهایی مانند پتاسیم و قلیاییت در برخی تیمارها تفاوت معناداری نداشتند (05/0
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Evaluation of physicochemical properties and purity indices of sugar beet syrup according to different irrigation conditions

نویسندگان English

Amir Nourjou 1
Iraj Karimi sani 2
Parviz Ahmadi Gheshlagh 3
1 Agricultural Engineering Research Department, West Azerbaijan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Urmia, Iran
2 Agricultural Engineering Research Department, West Azerbaijan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Urmia, Iran
3 Department of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Agriculture, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran
چکیده English

The present study was conducted to evaluate the physicochemical properties and purity indices of sugar beet syrup under different irrigation conditions. This study was conducted by implementing six different irrigation treatments including different combinations of row spacing and irrigation interval (full and every other). Harvested sugar beet samples were analyzed to determine physicochemical parameters including potassium, sodium, harmful nitrogen, alkalinity, sugar percentage, syrup purity and sugar in molasses. The results showed that treatments with row spacing of 50 to 60 cm and every other irrigation (I4) provided the highest syrup purity (83–85%) and sugar percentage (13–14%) (p<0.05), while the amounts of potassium, sodium and harmful nitrogen were also within acceptable ranges in these treatments. Significant differences were observed between treatments for syrup purity and sugar percentage indices (p<0.05), but parameters such as potassium and alkalinity did not differ significantly in some treatments (p<0.05). The findings of this study indicate that optimal irrigation management and selection of appropriate planting line spacing can improve the quality of sugar beet syrup in addition to increasing water use efficiency. These results can be used as a practical guide to determine effective irrigation treatments in similar climatic conditions.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Sugar beet
syrup purity
sugar quality
Irrigation
[1]    Dogbe, E.S., et al., Revitalizing the sugarcane industry by adding value to A‐molasses in biorefineries. 2020. 14(5): p. 1089-1104.
[2]    Najafi, P., et al., Measuring the overall efficiency of the sugar supply chain in Iran. 2021. 23(4): p. 783-796.
[3]    Zaki Dizaji, H., et al., Application of E-nose technique to predict sugarcane syrup quality based on purity and refined sugar percentage. 2021. 58(11): p. 4149-4156.
[4]    Namdari, M., et al., Use of LCA indicators to assess Iranian sugar production systems: Case study—Hamadan Province. 2024. 14(5): p. 6759-6772.
[5]    Muir, B.M., Sugar beet processing to sugars, in Sugar beet cultivation, management and processing. 2022, Springer. p. 837-862.
[6]    Babu, A.S. and S.A.O. Adeyeye, Extraction of sugar from sugar beets and cane sugar, in Extraction Processes in the Food Industry. 2024, Elsevier. p. 177-196.
[7]    Soleymani, M., et al., Investigating the potential of bubbling and ultrasonic processes in reducing the fouling of the ultrafiltration membrane during the purification of raw sugar beet syrup. 2024.
[8]    Naseri, H., et al., Sustainability of quantitative and qualitative indicators of sugarcane production under different tillage systems (case study: Khuzestan province of Iran). 2020. 8: p. 100046.
[9]    Fathollah Taleghani, D., et al., Effect of Nitrogen Rates on Yield, Non-Sugar Impurities and NUE of Four Sugar Beet Varieties under Drip Irrigation Conditions. 2024. 4(2): p. 89-97.
[10] Saeidimajd, G., et al., Optimizing Irrigation and Nitrogen Fertilizer Cessation to Enhance Yield and Quality of Sugarcane. 2025: p. 1-11.
[11] Mekdad, A.A., et al., Integrated application of K and Zn as an avenue to promote sugar beet yield, industrial sugar quality, and K-use efficiency in a salty semi-arid agro-ecosystem. 2021. 11(4): p. 780.
[12] Singh, I., R. Verma, and T.J.S.T. Srivastava, Growth, yield, irrigation water use efficiency, juice quality and economics of sugarcane in pusa hydrogel application under different irrigation scheduling. 2018. 20(1): p. 29-35.
[13] Manzoor, M., et al., Optimizing sugarcane growth, yield, and quality in different ecological zones and irrigation sources amidst environmental stressors. 2023. 12(20): p. 3526.
[14] Awulachew, M.J.J.A.S.F.R., A Systematic Review of Sugar Processing Sector and Food Safety. 2025. 16: p. 197.
[15] Sahu, O.J.A.o.A.S., Assessment of sugarcane industry: Suitability for production, consumption, and utilization. 2018. 16(4): p. 389-395.
[16] Antczak-Chrobot, A., P. Bąk, and M.J.F.c. Wojtczak, The use of ionic chromatography in determining the contamination of sugar by-products by nitrite and nitrate. 2018. 240: p. 648-654.
[17] Ahmed, N., et al., Acidified carbon with variable irrigation sources impact on rice growth and yield under Cd toxic alkaline Soil conditions. 2022. 14(16): p. 10086.
[18] El-Sharkawy, M., et al., Novel glauconite compounds improve soil properties and sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) yields in saline soils. 2025. 13: p. e19452.
[19] Hassanli, A.M., S. Ahmadirad, and S.J.A.W.M. Beecham, Evaluation of the influence of irrigation methods and water quality on sugar beet yield and water use efficiency. 2010. 97(2): p. 357-362.
[20] Wojtczak, M., ICUMSA-International Commission for Uniform Methods of Sugar Analysis. 2003.
[21] Mukherjee, E. and S.J.S.T. Gantait, Genetic transformation in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.): technologies and applications. 2023. 25(2): p. 269-281.
[22] Zhang, Y., J. Nan, and B.J.F.i.P.S. Yu, OMICS technologies and applications in sugar beet. 2016. 7: p. 900.
[23] Valli, V., et al., Sugar cane and sugar beet molasses, antioxidant-rich alternatives to refined sugar. 2012. 60(51): p. 12508-12515.
[24] Gayathry, G. and M. Shanmuganathan, Processed sugar: is a necessary evil.
[25] Hryhorenko, N., N. Husiatynska, and O.J.U.F.J. Kalenyk, Substantiation of a rational method of purification of sugar sorghum juice in the technology of food syrup production. 2021. 10(2): p. 263-276.
[26] Al-Dhumri, S.A., et al., Application of molasses as an Eco-Innovative approach substitutes mineral nitrogen fertilization and enhances sugar beet productivity. 2023. 14(1): p. 287-296.
[27] Xie, X., et al., Potassium determines sugar beets’ yield and sugar content under drip irrigation condition. 2022. 14(19): p. 12520.
[28] Vicentini-Polette, C.M., et al., Minerals levels in sugarcane syrup. 2024. 44.
[29] Arjeh, E., et al., Phenolic compounds of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.): Separation method, chemical characterization, and biological properties. 2022. 10(12): p. 4238-4246.
[30] Salles, P., et al. Brown, Crystal, Refined and Organic Sugar Samples from Several Countries: Evaluation of Chemical Impurities. in Proceedings of the INAC 2021: international nuclear atlantic conference. Nuclear technology: reducing our carbon footprint and increasing quality of life. 2021.
[31] Karimi Sani, Iraj; Behrouz Kazemzadeh; Bahram Hassani; Habib Navidifar; Parviz Ahmadi Gheshlagh; Zahra Salamat Mamkani. (1403). "Investigation of Physicochemical Properties and Mineral Analysis of White Sugar During Use". Iranian Journal of Food Science and Technology, Volume 21, Issue 149, Pages 195-209.
[32] Karimi Sani, I., et al., Physicochemical characteristics and mineral analysis of white sugar during Operation. 2024. 21(149): p. 195-209.
[33] Marasinghege, C., et al., One pot two-alkali clarification process to minimize sucrose degradation of clarified sugarcane juice during evaporation. 2024. 374: p. 112022.
[34] Feizi, M., J. Fallahzade, and P.J.J.o.P.N. Noorshargh, Sugar beet yield response to different levels of saline irrigation water and leaching in an arid region. 2018. 41(5): p. 654-663.
[35] Johannes, L.P. and T.D.J.E. Xuan, Comparative analysis of acidic and alkaline pretreatment techniques for bioethanol production from perennial grasses. 2024. 17(5): p. 1048.
[36] Rerhou, B., et al., Compost applications improve soil fertility, sugar beet performances, and decrease sclerotium rolfsii sacc. Survival under saline irrigation in a semi-arid climate. 2024. 24(1): p. 586-605.
[37] Hosseini, L., et al., Evaluation of water and nitrogen use efficiency, digestibility and some quantitative and qualitative characteristics of forage beet cultivars under different irrigation methods and nitrogen levels. 2022. 74(1): p. 177-191.
[38] Yetik, A.K., B.N.J.P. Candoğan, Soil, and Environment, Optimisation of irrigation strategy in sugar beet farming based on yield, quality and water productivity. 2022. 68(8).
[39] Topak, R., et al., Performance of partial root-zone drip irrigation for sugar beet production in a semi-arid area. 2016. 176: p. 180-190.
[40] Fabeiro, C., et al., Production and quality of the sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) cultivated under controlled deficit irrigation conditions in a semi-arid climate. 2003. 62(3): p. 215-227.
[41] Rinaldi, M. and A.V.J.F.C.R. Vonella, The response of autumn and spring sown sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) to irrigation in Southern Italy: water and radiation use efficiency. 2006. 95(2-3): p. 103-114.
[42] Topak, R., S. Süheri, and B.J.I.S. Acar, Effect of different drip irrigation regimes on sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) yield, quality and water use efficiency in Middle Anatolian, Turkey. 2011. 29(1): p. 79-89.
Bakhshkandi, H., B. Mirshekari, and A. Pedram, Yield quality as affected by syrup concentration in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris): stepwise regression analysis. 2014.44.        Campbell, L.G.J.J.o.c.p., Sugar beet quality improvement. 2002. 5(1-2): p. 395-413