مجله علوم و صنایع غذایی ایران

مجله علوم و صنایع غذایی ایران

Enhanced Disinfection of Food Surfaces Using Combined SDS and Organic Acid Treatments: Efficacy Against Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Staphylococcus aureus

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی اصیل

نویسندگان
1 گروه بهداشت مواد غذایی دانشکده دامپزشکی دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز اهواز- ایران
2 گروه بهداشت مواد غذایی دانشکده دامپزشکی دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز
3 فارغ التحصیل کارشناسی ارشد بهداشت و کنترل کیفی مواد غذایی، دانشکده دامپزشکی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز
10.48311/fsct.2025.115645.0
چکیده
Escherichia coli O157 and Staphylococcus aureus are significant foodborne pathogens that present challenges for effective removal from surfaces in food processing and healthcare environments. This study aimed to investigate the bactericidal effects of combined treatments using sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) with lactic acid and citric acid, alongside factors such as temperature and exposure time, to reduce E. coli O157:H7

and S. aureus on various surfaces. Bacterial strains were treated with varying concentrations of SDS, lactic acid, and citric acid at different temperatures over a range of exposure times. The bactericidal effectiveness of the combinations was first assessed in suspension, and the most effective combinations were selected for testing on ceramic, stainless steel, and plastic surfaces. Additionally, the impact of NaCl on SDS efficacy was evaluated. The results demonstrated that bacterial sensitivity varied between pathogens and surface types. E. coli O157:H7 and S. aureus showed enhanced sensitivity to SDS combined with lactic acid at higher temperatures, with the optimal combination of SDS 1% + 0.05% lactic acid at 45°C providing significant log reductions on surfaces. The optimized SDS–lactic acid combinations achieved up to a 6.24 log reduction in E. coli O157:H7 and a 4.5 log reduction in S. aureus, with complete inactivation observed on stainless steel and ceramic surfaces. The addition of NaCl notably reduced the bactericidal activity of SDS. Among surface types, stainless steel required the least contact time for bacterial removal, followed by ceramic and plastic, which necessitated longer exposure. In conclusion, combined solutions of SDS and an organic acid, particularly at elevated temperatures, are effective in reducing pathogenic bacteria on various surfaces. The SDS and lactic acid combination at 45°C is recommended as a potential disinfection method for E. coli and S. aureus on food and healthcare surfaces.

 
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Enhanced Disinfection of Food Surfaces Using Combined SDS and Organic Acid Treatments: Efficacy Against Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Staphylococcus aureus

نویسندگان English

Siavash Maktabi 1
Mahdi PourMahdi Borujeni 2
Liela Elahinia 3
1 Department of Food Hygiene, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
2 Department of Food Hygiene, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Box: 61355-145, Ahvaz, Iran
3 Graduated from Department of Food Hygiene, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Iran
چکیده English

Escherichia coli O157 and Staphylococcus aureus are significant foodborne pathogens that present challenges for effective removal from surfaces in food processing and healthcare environments. This study aimed to investigate the bactericidal effects of combined treatments using sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) with lactic acid and citric acid, alongside factors such as temperature and exposure time, to reduce E. coli O157:H7

and S. aureus on various surfaces. Bacterial strains were treated with varying concentrations of SDS, lactic acid, and citric acid at different temperatures over a range of exposure times. The bactericidal effectiveness of the combinations was first assessed in suspension, and the most effective combinations were selected for testing on ceramic, stainless steel, and plastic surfaces. Additionally, the impact of NaCl on SDS efficacy was evaluated. The results demonstrated that bacterial sensitivity varied between pathogens and surface types. E. coli O157:H7 and S. aureus showed enhanced sensitivity to SDS combined with lactic acid at higher temperatures, with the optimal combination of SDS 1% + 0.05% lactic acid at 45°C providing significant log reductions on surfaces. The optimized SDS–lactic acid combinations achieved up to a 6.24 log reduction in E. coli O157:H7 and a 4.5 log reduction in S. aureus, with complete inactivation observed on stainless steel and ceramic surfaces. The addition of NaCl notably reduced the bactericidal activity of SDS. Among surface types, stainless steel required the least contact time for bacterial removal, followed by ceramic and plastic, which necessitated longer exposure. In conclusion, combined solutions of SDS and an organic acid, particularly at elevated temperatures, are effective in reducing pathogenic bacteria on various surfaces. The SDS and lactic acid combination at 45°C is recommended as a potential disinfection method for E. coli and S. aureus on food and healthcare surfaces.

 

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Disinfectant
Escherichia coli
Staphylococcus aureus
Sodium dodecyl sulfate
Food safety
[1] Tack, D. M., Kisselburgh, H. M., Richardson, L. C., Geissler, A., Griffin, P. M., Payne, D. C., & Gleason, B. L. (2021). Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli outbreaks in the United States, 2010–2017. Microorganisms, 9(7), 1529.
[2] Singha, S., Thomas, R., Viswakarma, J. N., & Gupta, V. K. (2023). Foodborne illnesses of Escherichia coli O157origin and its control measures. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 60(4), 1274-1283.
[3] Bashabsheh, R. H., AL-Fawares, O. L., Natsheh, I., Bdeir, R., Al-Khreshieh, R. O., & Bashabsheh, H. H. (2024). Staphylococcus aureus epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations and application of nano-therapeutics as a promising approach to combat methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Pathogens and Global Health, 118(3), 209-231.
[4] Pal, M., Shuramo, M. Y., Tewari, A., Srivastava, J. P., & Steinmetz, C. H. (2023). Staphylococcus aureus from a commensal to zoonotic pathogen: a critical appraisal. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med. Res, 7, 220-228.
[5] Okaiyeto, S. A., Sutar, P. P., Chen, C., Ni, J. B., Wang, J., Mujumdar, A. S., ... & Xiao, H. W. (2024). Antibiotic resistant bacteria in food systems: Current status, resistance mechanisms, and mitigation strategies. Agriculture Communications, 100027.
[6] Agüeria, D. A., Libonatti, C., & Civit, D. (2021). Cleaning and disinfection programmes in food establishments: a literature review on verification procedures. Journal of applied microbiology, 131(1), 23-35.
[7] Ezzatpanah, H., GómezLópez, V. M., Koutchma, T., Lavafpour, F., Moerman, F., Mohammadi, M., & Raheem, D. (2022). Risks and new challenges in the food chain: Viral contamination and decontamination from a global perspective, guidelines, and cleaning. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 21(2), 868-903.
[8] Madhavi, A., Srinivasulu, M., Chandra, M. S., & Rangaswamy, V. (2022). Disinfectants. In Environmental Micropollutants (pp. 91-115). Elsevier.
[9] Maktabi, S., Safdari, Z., & PourMahdi Borujeni, M. (2023). Examination of microbial and chemical properties of chicken fillet treated with Satureja rechingeri essential oil, sodium dodecyl sulfate and citric acid during refrigerated storage. Journal of food science and technology (Iran), 20(140), 1-15.
[10] Byelashov OA, Kendall PA, Belk KE, Scanga JA, Sofos JN. Control of Listeria monocytogenes on vacuum-packaged frankfurters sprayed with lactic acid alone or in combination with sodium lauryl sulfate. Journal of food protection. 2008 Apr;71(4):728-34.
[11] Zhao T, Zhao P, Doyle MP. Inactivation of Salmonella and Escherichia coli O157: H7 on lettuce and poultry skin by combinations of levulinic acid and sodium dodecyl sulfate. Journal of food protection. 2009 May;72(5):928-36.
[12] Zhao T, Zhao P, Cannon JL, Doyle MP. Inactivation of Salmonella in biofilms and on chicken cages and preharvest poultry by levulinic acid and sodium dodecyl sulfate. Journal of food protection. 2011 Dec;74(12):2024-30.
[13] Stelzleni AM, Ponrajan A, Harrison MA. Effects of buffered vinegar and sodium dodecyl sulfate plus levulinic acid on Salmonella Typhimurium survival, shelf-life, and sensory characteristics of ground beef patties. Meat science. 2013 Sep 1;95(1):1-7.
[14 Maktabi, S., Zarei, M., & Rashnavady, R. (2018). Effect of sequential treatments with sodium dodecyl sulfate and citric acid or hydrogen peroxide on the reduction of some foodborne pathogens on eggshell. Iranian journal of veterinary research, 19(2), 113.
[15] Maktabi, S., Brojeni, M. P., & Elahinia, L. (2023). Decontamination of Salmonella Typhimurium and Listeria monocytogenes on Food-Related Surfaces by a Combination of Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate, Lactic Acid, or Citric Acid Under Different Temperatures. Avicenna Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 9(4), 157-164.
[16] Gorman, S., & Scott, E. (2004). Chemical disinfectants, antiseptics and preservatives. Hugo and Russell’s Pharmaceutical Microbiology, 285-305.
[17] Bai, Y., Ding, X., Zhao, Q., Sun, H., Li, T., Li, Z., ... & Xu, S. (2022). Development of an organic acid compound disinfectant to control food-borne pathogens and its application in chicken slaughterhouses. Poultry Science, 101(6), 101842.
[18] Lu Y, Wu C. Reductions of Salmonella enterica on chicken breast by thymol, acetic acid, sodium dodecyl sulfate or hydrogen peroxide combinations as compared to chlorine wash. Int J Food Microbiol. 2012;152(1-2):31-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.09.015.
[19] Li Y, Wu C. Enhanced inactivation of Salmonella Typhimurium from blueberries by combinations of sodium dodecyl sulfate with organic acids or hydrogen peroxide. Food Res Int. 2013;54(2):1553-9. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2013.09.012.
[20] Nei D, Okunishi T. Bactericidal effect of sodium dodecyl sulfate in combination with various additives. J NARO Res Dev. 2022;2022(10):47-53. doi: 10.34503/naroj.2022.10_47.
[21] Zhou M, Doyle MP, Chen D. Combination of levulinic acid and sodium dodecyl sulfate on inactivation of foodborne microorganisms: a review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2020;60(15):2526-31. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2019.1650249.
[22] Tong, C., Hu, H., Chen, G., Li, Z., Li, A., & Zhang, J. (2021). Disinfectant resistance in bacteria: Mechanisms, spread, and resolution strategies. Environmental research, 195, 110897.
[23] Xu Q, Nakajima M, Ichikawa S, Nakamura N, Roy P, Okadome H, et al. Effects of surfactant and electrolyte concentrations on bubble formation and stabilization. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2009;332(1):208-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2008.12.044.