امکان سنجی صمغ گیری و خنثی سازی روغن خام کانولا با استفاده از غشای پلی وینیلیدین فلوئوراید

نویسندگان
1 دانش آموخته دکترای علوم و صنایع غذایی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
2 استاد گروه علوم و صنایع غذایی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
3 دانشیار گروه شیمی، واحد تهران شمال، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
4 دانشیار گروه فناوری صنایع غذایی، دانشکده ابوریحان، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
چکیده
در این پژوهش امکان­سنجی صمغ­گیری و خنثی­سازی روغن خام کانولا با استفاده از فرایند غشایی بررسی شده است. میسلای روغن خام کانولا با استفاده از حلال هگزان به نسبت­های 20:80 و 30:70 تهیه و جهت صمغ­گیری و پس از افزودن %3/0 اسیدفسفریک %85 تحت سطوح فشار 2، 3 و 4 بار و سرعت جریان در 5/0 و m/s0/1 از غشا عبور داده شد؛ در مرحله خنثی­سازی نیز پس از افزودن محلول آبی سود NaOH در دو غلظت %10 و %30 تحت شرایط قبل و همچنین سطوح دمایی 30، 40 و 50 درجه سانتیگراد از غشا عبور داده شد. مطابق نتایج در میسلای 20:80، با گذشت زمان شار تراوه به تدریج کاهش یافته و پس از 20 دقیقه به حالت پایا رسید؛ بررسی اثر توام دما و فشار بر میزان شار تراوه در مرحله خنثی­سازی و در شرایط تعادلی آشکار ساخت که بیشترین شار مربوط به شرایط 0 C40 و bar4 و m/s0/1 می­باشد؛ همچنین در میسلای 30:70 نیز بیشترین شار مربوط به شرایط 0 C50 و bar2 و m/s0/1 بود. نتایج آزمون­های فیزیکوشیمیایی نیز آشکار ساخت که اختلاف معنی داری میان میزان فسفر و فسفاتیدها در هر دو روش فیلتراسیون غشایی و تصفیه سنتی مشاهده نشد (01/0>p)؛ اما کاهش اسیدیته در روش فیلتراسیون غشایی نسبت به روش تصفیه کلاسیک، به طرز معنی داری بیشتر بود (01/0>p). کاهش اندیس پراکسید نیز در روش تصفیه کلاسیک نسبت به روش فیلتراسیون غشایی، به طرز معنی داری بیشتر بود (01/0>p). از لحاظ رنگ نیز نتایج نشان داد که روش فیلتراسیون غشایی قادر به کاهش رنگ زرد در روغن خام نبود در حالی که روش تصفیه کلاسیک، به طرز معنی داری رنگ زرد را کاهش داد (01/0>p). شاخص رنگ قرمز در روش تصفیه کلاسیک نیز، کاهش معنی داری نسبت به روش غشایی داشت (01/0>p).
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Feasibility of degumming and neutralization of crude rapeseed oil using polyvinylidene fluoride membrane

نویسندگان English

Maryam Rashidian 1
Maryam Gharachorloo 2
Manochehr Bahmaei 3
Mehrdad Ghavami 2
Hossein Mirsaeedghazi 4
1 PhD graduated of Food Science and Technology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Professor of Food Science and Technology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
3 Associate Professor of Department of Chemistry, Tehran North Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
4 Associate Professor of Department of Food Technology, College of Abouraihan, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده English

Current research, has evaluated the efficiency of the membrane process in degumming and neutralization of crude rapeseed oil. Crude rapeseed oil miscellas were prepared using hexane solvent with 20:80 and 30:70 ratios. In order to degumming, the micella passed through the membrane after adding 0.3% of 85% (w/w) phosphoric acid, under three pressure levels of 2, 3, and 4bar and two flow speed of 0.5 and 1m/s; Then, for neutralization, after adding NaOH aqueous solution in two concentrations of 10% and 30% (w/v) the micella passed through the membrane, under the previous conditions, as well as three temperature levels of 30, 40 and 500C. The results showed that for 20:80 micella, the flux gradually decreased with the passage of time and reached a stable state after about 20 minutes. Surveying the simultaneous effect of conditions throught the neutralization process for 20:80 micella, revealed that the highest flux corresponds to 400C, 4bar, 1.0m/s. Surveying the simultaneous effect of temperature, pressure and flow rate throught the neutralization process for 30:70 micella, has also revealed that the highest flux corresponds to 500C, 2bar, and 1.0m/s. The results of the physicochemical tests also revealed that there is no significant difference in the levels of phosphorus and phosphates in both membrane filtration and conventional rifining methods (p<0.01); But acidity reduction for membrane filtration method was significantly higher than that of classical refining method (p<0.01). The reduction of peroxide index was also significantly higher for classic refining method than membrane filtration method (p<0.01). In terms of color, the results showed that the membrane filtration method was not able to reduce the yellow color in crude oil, while the classic refining method significantly reduced the yellow color (p<0.01). The red color index for the classic method also had a significant decrease compared to the membrane method (p<0.01).

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Canola oil
Membrane
filtration
permeate flux
Phosphatides
acidity
color
[1] Tomaino, A., Cimino, F., Zimbalatti, V., Venuti. (2005). Influence of Heating on antioxidant activity and the chemical composition of some spice essential oil, Food Chemistry, 89(4):549-554.
[2] Khattab, R., Rempel, C., Suh, M., & Thiyam, U. (2012). Quality of canola oil obtained by conventional and supercritical fluid extraction, 3(12): 966-976.
[3] Niazmand, R., Farhoush, R., Razavi, S.M.A., Mousavi, S.M. (2013). Investigating the effect of membrane filtration process on oxidation parameters of canola oil. Quarterly Journal of Food Sciences and Industries. 40(10): 81-91.
[4] Salehi, F.D., Raxavi, S.M.A. (2010). Solvent recovery from rapeseed oil-hexane misela using nanofiltration membrane process. Electronic magazine of food processing and preservation. 2(4): 107-121.
[5] Hafidi, A., Pioch, D., & Ajana, H. (2005). Membrane-based simultaneous degumming and deacidification of vegetable oils. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies 6: 203-212.
[6] Abdellah, M. H., Scholes, C. A., Liu, L., & Kentish, S. E. (2019). Efficient degumming of crude canola oil using ultrafiltration membranes and bio-derived solvents. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, 59: 102-274.
[7] More, N. S., & Gogate, P. R. (2018). Intensified degumming of crude soybean oil using cavitational reactors. Journal of Food Engineering, 218: 33–43.
[8] Hou, Z; Cao, X; Cao, L; Ling, G; Yu, Z and Pang, M (2020). The removal of phospholipid from crude rapeseed oil by enzyme-membrane binding. J. Food Eng. 280: 1-16
[9] Cao, T.N, Bui, X.T., Le, L.T, Dang, B., Tran D.P.H., Vo, T.K.Q., Tran, H.T., et al. (2022). An overview of deploying membrane bioreactors in saline wastewater treatment from perspectives of microbial and treatment performance. Bioresource Technology. 363: 127-146.
[10] Hermia, J (1982). Constant pressure blocking filtrationlaw application to powder-law non-newtonian fluid. Tran’s inst Chem eng, 60: 183-187.
[11] American Oil Chemists' Society. (2009). AOCS Official Method Ca 12-55: Phosphorus, 2 pages.
[12] Isiri, 4179. (2017). Vegetable and animal oils and fats - measurement of peroxide amount by iodometric method - determination of end point by visual method, National Organization of Standards of Iran.
[13] Isiri, 4178. (2021). Vegetable and animal oils and fats - Measurement of acid number and acidity, National Organization of Standards of Iran.
[14] American Oil Chemists' Society. (2009). AOCS Cc 13e_02: colour, 2 pages.
[15] Rafe, A., Razavi, S. M. A., & Khodaparast, M. H. (2012). Refining of crude canola oil using PSA ultrafiltration membrane. International Journal of Food Engineering, 8(2): 1-23.
[16] Subramanian, R., Raghavarao, K., Nabetani, H., Nakajima, M., Kimura, T., & Maekawa, T. (2001). Differential permeation of oil constituents in nonporous dense polymeric membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 187: 57–69.
[17] Tres, M. V., Mohr, S., Corazza, M. L., Luccio, M. D., & Oliveira, J. V. (2009). Separation of n-butane from soybean oil mixtures using membrane processes. Journal of Membrane Science 333: 141-146.
[18] Pagliero, C., Mattea, M., Ochoa, N., Marchese, J. (2007). Fouling of polymeric membranes during degumming of crude sunflower and soybean oil. Journal of Food Engineering 78: 194–197.
[19] Fersi, C., Dhahbi, M. (2008). Treatment of textile plant effluent by ultrafiltration and/or nanofiltration for water reuse. Desalination, 222 (1-3): 263-271.
[20] Darnoko, D. (2006). Carotenoids from red palm methyl esters by nanofiltration. Journal of the American Oil Chemist’s Society, 83(4): 365-370
[21] Alicieo, T.V.R., Mendes, E.S., Pereira, N.C., Lima, O.C.M. (2002). Membrane ultrafiltration of crude soybean oil. Desalination, 148 (1-3): 99-102.
[22] Rafe, A. & Razavi, S. M. A., (2009). Water and hexane permeate flux through UF polysulfone amide membrane. Desalination, 236: 39-45.
[23] Amin, I. N. H. M., Mohammad, A. W., Markom, M., Peng, L. C., & Hilal, N. (2010). Flux decline study during ultrafiltration of glycerin-rich fatty acid solutions. Journal of Membrane Science 351: 75-86.
[24] Zhu,X., Dudchenko, Gu, A., Jassby X. D. (2017). Surfactant-stabilized oil separation from water using ultrafiltration and nanofiltration, J. Membr. Sci. 529: 159–169.
[25] Rautenbach, R. (1989). Membrane processes. Chichester, New York : Wiley.
[26] Hua, B., & Scott, K. (2008). Microfiltration of water in oil emulsions and evaluation of fouling mechanism. Chemical Engineering Journal 136: 210-220.
[27] Azmi, A.R., Gog, P., Ismail, A.F., Lau, W.J., Othman, N.H. Noor, A.M. Yusoff, M.S.A. (2015). Deacidification of crude palm oil using PVA-crosslinked PVDF membrane, Journal of Food Engineering, 166: 165-173
[28] Niazmand, R; Mohammad, S; Razavi, A., and Farhoosh, R (2015). Colloid-enhanced ultrafiltration of canola oil: Effect of process conditions and MWCO on flux, fouling and rejections. J. Food Process. Preserv. 39: 292-300.
[29] FAO. (1999). Codex Standard for Edible Fats and Oils, CODEX STAN 19-1981, Rev.2.
[30] Bottino, A., Capannelli, G., Comite, A., Ferrari, F., Marotta, F., Mattei, A., & Turchini, A. (2004). Application of membrane processes for the filtration of extra virgin olive oil. Journal of Food Engineering, 65: 303-309.
[31] Aryanti, N., Wardhani, D.H., Nafiunisa A. (2018). Ultrafiltration membrane for degumming of crude palm oil-isopropanol mixture Chem. Biochem. Eng. Q., 32 (3): 325-334.
[32] Ismail, D.N.F.A., Ghazali, N. (2018). Separation of fatty acids from palm oil using organic solvent nanofiltration. Malaysian Journal of Analytical Science 22(3):561-569.