تأثیر سیستم‌های مختلف تربیت تاک بر عمر انبارمانی میوه انگور رقم سفید بی‌دانه

نویسندگان
1 دانش‌آموخته کارشناسی ارشد، گروه علوم و مهندسی باغبانی دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی خوزستان، خوزستان، ایران
2 استادیار گروه علوم و مهندسی باغبانی دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی خوزستان، خوزستان، ایران
3 دانشیار گروه علوم و مهندسی باغبانی دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی خوزستان، خوزستان، ایران
4 دانشیار گروه مهندسی علوم باغبانی، دانشکده کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه بین‌المللی امام خمینی (ره)، قزوین،
5 استادیار گروه مهندسی تولید و ژنتیک گیاهی دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی خوزستان، خوزستان، ایران
چکیده
در این پژوهش به‏منظور حفظ کیفیت میوه انگور در دوره انبارمانی، اثر سیستم تربیت تاک و زمان انبارمانی بر برخی صفات میوه انگور از قبیل درصد آلودگی حبه، درصد ریزش حبه، میزان قهوه‏ای شدن حبه، اسیدیته قابل تیتراسیون، مواد جامد محلول، فنل کل و میزان فعالیت آنزیم‏های پراکسیداز، پلی‏فنل‏اکسیداز و فنیل‏آلانین‏آمونیالیاز در دوره انبارمانی بررسی شد. آزمایش بهصورت فاکتوریل در قالب طرح کاملاً تصادفی با دو عامل سیستم تربیت تاک (خزنده، پرگولا و کوردون) و زمان انبارمانی (صفر، 20، 40 و 60 روز پس از انبارمانی) با سه تکرار در طی سال‏های 97-1396 انجام شد. پس از انتقال میوه‏ها به سردخانه با دمای 4+ درجه سلسیوس و رطوبت نسبی 85-90 درصد و نگهداری به مدت دو ماه برخی صفات میوه انگور طی روزهای مختلف پس از انبارمانی مورد بررسی قرار گرفتند. نتایج نشان داد که اثر زمان انبارمانی بر میزان قهوه‏ای شدن حبه در سطح احتمال یک درصد معنی‏دار شد. همچنین، اثر بر‏همکنش سیستم تربیت تاک و زمان انبارمانی بر میزان اسیدیته قابل تیتراسیون و سایر ویژگی‏های اندازه‏گیری شده، به‏ترتیب درسطح احتمال پنج درصد و یک درصد معنی‏دار شد. به‏طورکلی نتایج نشان دادند که سیستم تربیت کوردون بهترین اثر را در حفظ صفات میوه انگور در طی دوره انبار مانی نسبت به سایر روش های تربیت داشت.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

The effect of different vine training systems on the shelf life of Vitis vinifera cv. Bidane Sefid

نویسندگان English

Masoumeh Shokri 1
Mostafa Rahmati-Joneidabad 2
Mokhtar Heidari 3
Mousa Rasouli 4
Ahmad Zare 5
1 graduated from the Master of Science (MSc), Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources of Khuzestan
2 Assistant Professor , Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources of Khuzestan
3 Associate Professor, Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources of Khuzestan
4 Associate Professor, Department of Horticultural Science Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin
5 Assistant Professor, Department of Production Engineering and Plant Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, Agricultural and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan
چکیده English

In this study, the effect of vine training system and storage time were evaluated on some grape characteristics, such as berry contamination percentage, berry shedding percentage, berry browning rate, titratable acidity, soluble solids, total phenol and the activity of peroxidase, polyphenol oxidase and phenylalanine ammonia-lyase enzymes, in order to maintain the quality of grape during storage time. Factorial experiment was conducted based on completely randomized design with two factors of vine training system (khazandeh, pergola and cordon) and storage time (zero, 20, 40 and 60 days after storage) with three replications during 2018-2019. After transferring the fruits to the cold storage with temperature of +4◦C, relative humidity of 85-90% and storage for two months, some characteristics of grape were examined on different days after storage. The results showed that the effect of storage time on berry browning was significant at the level of 1% probability. Also, the effect of interaction between vine training system and storage time on titratable acidity and on the other measured characteristics was significant at the level of 5% and 1% probability, respectively. In general, the results showed that the cordon training system had the best effect in maintaining the characteristics of grape during the storage period compared to other training methods.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Polyphenol oxidase enzyme
Storage
Contamination percentage
Berry shedding percentage
Pre-harvest factors
1[GholamAlizadeh, S., MirzaKazemi, M. (2012). The importance of women's participation in reducing post-harvest horticultural waste. The first national conference on sustainable development of agriculture and healthy environment.P:750[In Persian].
]2[Rafiei, M., Erfani Moghadam, J., Fazeli, A. (2016). Genetic diversity between all groups of different cultivars of seedless and seeded white grapes in Arak city based on morphological characteristics. Journal of Plant Production Research, 23 (3), 134-115[In Persian].
]3[Lucian, L.M., Lazar, S.L., Lazar, M., Ciuzan, O., Pamfiil, D. (2015). Pharmacological Effects of Bioactive Compounds from (Vitis vinifera L.) Grape. Pro-Environment, 8(23), 365.
]4[FAO. (2019). Grape production statistics. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAOSTAT. http://www. FAO.org/faostat/en/data/QC. Visited: 25/10/2019.
]5[Jamalpour Birgani, Z. (2016). Effects of Scion-Base Combination, Covering Methods and Storage on Transplant Efficiency in Grape Cultivars. Master Thesis in Horticulture. Khuzestan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources. P: 11[In Persian].
]6[Maghsoudi, Sh. (2008). Grape technology and its products. Iranian Agricultural Science.P:14[In Persian].
]7[Jalili Marandi, R. (2007). Small Fruits. Urmia University Jihad Publications. P:166[In Persian].
]8[Zhang, Z., Wu, W., Fan, M., Wei, J., Tan, Y., Wang, Q. (2019). Evaluation of MAIAC aerosol retrievals over China. Atmospheric environment, 202, 8-16.‌
]9[Rajkumar, P., Mitali, B. (2009). Effect of different storage method on nutritional quality of water apple fruits (Syzygium Javanica L.). Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 15 (1), 41-46.
]10[Musacchi, S. and Serra, S. 2018. Apple fruit quality: overview on pre-harvest factors. Scientia Horticulturae, 234, 409-430.
]11[Rasouli, V. (2016). The effect of Some Grapevine Training Systems on Yield and Privalency Some Pests and Diseases in Vitis vinifera Var. Sefid Bidaneh. Journal of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 20, 1-10[In Persian].
]12[Kavoosi, B., Hasanpor, B. (2018). Effects of Topping Date and Preharvest Irrigation Cut-Off on Some Qualitative and Quanitative Characteristics of Table Grapes (Vitis Vinifera L.) Cv. Askari. Journal of Plant Productions, 41 (1), 83-96[In Persian].
]13[Dadar, A. (2020). Replacement of scaffolding system instead of traditional system. Grape Extension Magazine.pp: 1-5[In Persian].
]14[Andrew, G., Justene, E. (2009). Influence of Grapevine Training Systems on Vine Growth and Fruit Composition. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 60(3), 251-268
]15[Miller, S.A., Broom, F.D., Throp, T.G., Barrnet, A. M. (2001). Effect of leader pruning on the vine architecture, productivity, quality of kiwifruit (Actinida deliciosa cv. Hayward). Scientia Horticulturae, 91(3-4), 189-199.
]16[Asghari, A.D., Piri, S., Rabiei, V. (2009). Effects of different training systems on the quantity and quality of grape varieties grapes raisin. In: Proceedings of 6th Iranian Horticultural Sciences Congress, 13-16 Jul., University of Guilan, Rasht.pp: 2009-2012.
]17[Mahmood Zadeh, H., Rasouli, V., Ghorbanian, D. (2009). Effect of Some Training Systems on Vegetative Growth, Fruit Yield and Fruit Quality of Vitis vinifera cv. Sefid Bidaneh in Takestan Region. Seed and Plant, 25(4), 374-387.
]18[Júnior, A. P., Neto, F. J. D., Monteiro, G. C., Borges, C. V., Lima, G. P. P., Tecchio, M. A. (2021). Biochemical profile of ‘Niagara Rosada’grapes under different rootstocks and training system. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Agrárias, 16(3), 1-6.
]19[Ozgur, Akgun., Gabler, K., Mansour, M., Smilanick, J.L. (2004). Postharvest ethanol and hot water treatments of table grapes to control gray mold. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 34, 169-177.
]20[Xu, W.T., Huang, K.L., Guo, F., Qu, W., Yang, J.J., Liang, Z.H., Luo, Y.B. (2007). Postharvest grapefruit seed extract and chitosan treatments of table grapes to control Botrytis cinerea. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 46, 86-94.
]21[Senguttuvan, J., Paulsamy, S., Karthika, K. (2014). Phytochemical analysis and evaluation of leaf and root parts of the medicinal herb, Hypochaeris radicata L. for in vitro antioxidant activities. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine, 4, 359-367.
]22[Chen, S., Zhang, M., Wang, S. (2010). Physiological and quality responses of Chinese ‘Suli’pear (Pyrus bretschneideri Rehd) to 1-MCP vacuum infiltration treatment. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 90(8), 1317-1322.
]23[Meng, X., Li, B., Liu, J., Tian, S. (2008). Physiological responses and quality attributes of table grape fruit to chitosan preharvest spray and postharvest coating during storage. Food Chemistry, 106(2), 501-508.
]24[De Oliveira, I.R., Crizel, G.R., Severo, J., Renard, C.M., Chaves, F.C., Rombaldi, C.V. (2016). Preharvest UV-C radiation influences physiological, biochemical and transcriptional changes in strawberry cv. Camarosa. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 108, 391-399.
]25[Hajitaghilo, R., Jalili Marandi, R., Asghari, M.R., Hemmaty, S. (2017). Effects of postharvest treatment with chitosan and salicylic acid on fungal decay caused by Botrytis cinerea and quality of rishbaba table grape (Vitis vinifera L.). Research in Pomology, 2 (1), 15-30[In Persian].
]26[Othman, O.C. (2012). Polyphenoloxidase and Perioxidase Activity During Open Air Ripening Storage of Pineapple (Ananas comosus L.), Mango (Mangifera indica L.) and Papaya (Carica papaya L.) Fruits Grown in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Tanzania Journal of Science, 38(3), 84-94.
]27[Topalovic, A., Mikulic– Petkovsek, M. (2010). Changes in sugars, organic acids and phenolics of grape berries of cultivar cardinal during ripening. Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment, 8 (3,4), 223- 227.
]28[Ghasemnezhad, M., Shiri, M. A. and Sanavi, M. 2010. Effect of chitosan coatings on some quality indices of apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) during cold storage. Environmental Science, 8, 25-33.
]29[Ghiasvand, P. (2011). Effect of putrescine and chitosan on storag life and some quality characteristics of grapes (Vitis vinifera L.) cv. Bidaneh Sefid. Master Thesis in Horticulture. Bu-Ali Sina University of Hamadan. P.2[In Persian].
]30[Pileh, F., Farokhzad, A., Esmaiili, M., Dolati Baneh, H. (2015). Effect of harvest time and storage duration on some biochemical attributes of table grape cv ‘Bidaneh Sefid, Foodresearch, 25 (4), 575-563[In Persian].
]31[Nath, K., Solanky K. U., Mahatma M. K., Madhubala S. R., Rakesh M. (2015). Role of Total Soluble Sugar, Phenols and Defense Related Enzymes in Relation to Banana Fruit Rot by Lasiodiplodia Theobromae [(Path.) Griff. and Maubl.] During Ripening. Journal of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, 6(299), 2-8.‌
]32[Bagal, U.R., Leebens mack, J.H., Walter Lorenz, W., Dean, J.F.D. (2012). The phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) gene family shows a gymnosperm specific line age. BMC Genoms, 13(3), 1471-2164.
]33[MohammadKhani, N., Abbaspour, N. (2015). Response of grape antioxidant system to salinity (Vitis vinifera L.). Nova Bioogca Reperta, 2 (1), 64-72[In Persian].