ویژگی‌های فیزیکوشیمیایی و حسی ماست نوشیدنی سین بیوتیک تولید شده‌ از آغوز و شیر گاومیش

نویسندگان
1 گروه علوم و صنایع غذایی، واحدنور، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، نور، ایران
2 گروه علوم و صنایع غذایی،واحد نور، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، نور، ایران
3 گروه علوم و صنایع غذایی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد
4 گروه علوم و صنایع غذایی واحد نور دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی نور ایران
چکیده
استفاده از آغوز به عنوان منبع طبیعی سرشار از ترکیبات زیست فعال رویکردی نوین در فرمولاسیون­های غذایی فراسودمند می باشد. هدف ازاین پژوهش، مطالعه اثرسطوح مختلف آغوز بر ویژگی­های کیفی ماست نوشیدنی حاوی عسل و باکتری پروبیوتیک لاکتوباسیلوس اسیدوفیلوس بود. تیمارهای تحقیق(۴,T۳,T۲,T۱T) را با افزودن سطوح مختلف آغوز (۲۰،۱۰،۰ و۳۰ درصد حجمی) به شیرگاومیش آماده نموده و سپس با ۲درصد استارترماست و باکتری لاکتوباسیلوس اسیدوفیلوس تلقیح شدند. به تمام تیمارها به جزتیمارشاهد(۴T) ۵درصد عسل افزوده شد. نمونه هادرطی ۲۱روزنگهداری در دمای۱±۴درجه سانتیگراد مورد ارزیابی های فیزیکوشیمیایی، میکربی وحسی قرارگرفتند. یافته­های مطالعه حاضر نشان داد که اثر سطوح مختلف آغوز برشاخص­های فیزیکوشیمیایی ماست نوشیدنی شامل pH ، اسیدیته، سینرزیس و پذیرش کلی در سطح 5 درصد معنی­دار بوده وباعث کاهش pH از 4/39 به 4/11 و افزایش اسیدیته از 95/73 به 110 درصد در طی دوره ماندگاری شد. همچنین افزایش غلظت آغوز در تیمارها میزان سینرزیس را از 29/22 به 28/34 درصد کاهش داد. نتایج آزمون حسی نشان داد پذیرش کلی تیمارها با افزایش غلظت آغوز تا 20 درصد افزایش وبا افزودن 30درصد آغوز کاهش یافته است(0/05>p). میزان زنده مانی باکتری لاکتوباسیلوس اسیدوفیلوس در تیمار۳T بیش از سایر تیمارها (108 *1.67) شمارش شد. تعداد باکتری پروبیوتیک از روز۱۴نگهداری یک سیکل لگاریتمی کاهش یافت اما تا 21 روز همچنان در محدوده تعریف شده برای محصولات پروبیوتیک بود(107*1/9).
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Physiochemical and sensory characteristics of synbiotic beverage yogurt developed from Buffalo´s colostrum & milk

نویسندگان English

Shahram Salar 1
Sara Jafarian 2
Seyed Ali Mortazavi 3
Leila Roozbeh nasiraie 4
1 food science & technology,Nour branch,Islamic azad university,NourmIran
2 food science & technology department,Nour branch,Islamic azad university,Nour,Iran
3 food science & technology,mashhad ferdowsi university
4 food science & technology,nour branch,islamic azad university,nour,iran
چکیده English

Using colostrum as natural source rich in bioactive compounds is a new approach in functional food formulations. The aim of this research was to study the effect of different levels of colostrum on the quality characteristics of beverage yogurt, containing honey and the probiotic bacteria Lactobacillus acidophilus. The treatments (T0, T1, T2, T3, T4) were prepared by adding different levels of colostrum (0, 10, 20 and 30%) to buffalo milk and then inoculated with 2% yogurt starter culture and Lactobacillus acidophilus. 5% honey was added to all treatments except control (T4). Samples were subjected to physicochemical and sensory evaluations during 21 days of storage at 4 ° C. The results showed that the effect of different levels of colostrum on the physicochemical characteristics of beverage yogurt including pH, acidity, synersis and overall acceptance was significant (p<0.05) and caused a decrease in pH (4.39 to 4.11) and an increase in acidity (95.73 to 110) during the storage. Also, increasing the level of colostrum in the treatments reduced the amount of synersis from 29.22 to 28.34. The results of sensory test showed that the overall acceptability of treatments decreased with increasing colostrum level. The viability of Lactobacillus acidophilus in treatment with 30% colostrum(T3) was counted higher than the other treatments (1.67 *108). The number of probiotic bacteria decreased by one logarithmic cycle from day 14 of storage, but for 21 days it was still in the range defined for probiotic products (1.9 * 107).

کلیدواژه‌ها English

buffalo colostrum
beverage yogurt
Synbiotic
Lactobacillus acidiphillus
honey
[1] FDA. 2008. Food Labeling Guide: Appendix B: Additional Requirements for Nutrient Content Claims.
[2] Tamime, A. Y. 2005. Probiotic dairy products. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, 1-216. NewYork, 1-400.
[3] Mattila-Sandholm, T. and Saarela, M. 2003.Functional dairy products. CRC press, NewYork, 1-400. Journal of Food Protection, 56(8), 731-733.
[4] Allgeyer, L.C. Miller, M.J. and Lee, S.Y.2009. Sensory and microbiological quality of yogurt drinks with prebiotics and probiotics, J. Dairy Sci. 93,4471–4479
[5] Eder, R. 2003. Drinkable yogurt beats the bagel. Drug Store News,25,42-48.
[6] Mortazavian, A. M. and Sohrabvandi, S. 1385. A Review on probiotics and probiotic food products (dairy products). Tehran, Ata press.483p. [ in Persian]
[7] Salminen, S., Owehand, A. and Marteau, P.2000. Functional foods and ingredients for gut health, Functional Foods 2000, Conference Proceedings, (ed. F. Angus & C. Miller), Leatherheadd publishing, 134-142.
[8] Tharmaraj, N. and Shah, N. P. 2003. Selective enumeration of Lactobacillus Delbrueckii ssp. Bulgaricus, Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacteria, Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, and Propionibacteria. Journal of Dairy Science Association, 86, 2288-2296.
[9] Zacarchenco, P. B. and Massaguer – Roig, S.2006. Properties of Streptococcus thermophilus fermented milk containing variable concentration of Bifidobacterium Longum and Lactobacillus acidophilus. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, 37, 338-344.
[10] Pereira, D. I. and Gibson, G. R. 2002.Effects of consumption of probiotics and prebiotics on serum levels in humans. Critical Reviews in Biochemical Molecular Biology,37, 259-280.
[11] Akalin, A.S. and Erisir, D. 2008. Effect of inulin and oligofructose on the rheological characteristics and probiotic culture survival in effect of honey in improving the gut microbial balance. J Food Sci.,73,184–188.
[12] Fazilah, N. F., Ariff, A. B., Khayat, M., E., Rios-Solis, L, and Halim, M. 2018. Influence of probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics and bioactive phytochemicals on the formulation of functional yogurt. Journal of Functional Food,48, 387–399.
[13] Das, A., Seth, R., Lal, D. and Sharma, V. 21013. Evaluation of physico-chemical properties of colostrum supplemented dahi. International Journal of Food and Nutrition Science, 2, 40-44.
[14] Naserian, A.A. and Saremi, B. 2016. Water buffalo industry in Iran. Ital.J.Anim.Sci. 6(2), 1404-1405.
[15] Conneely, M., Berry, D.P., Murphy, J.P., Lorenz, I., Doherty, M.L, and Kennedy, E. 2014. Effect of feeding colostrum at different volumes and subsequent number of transition milk feeds on the serum immunoglobulin G concentration and health status of dairy calves. Journal of Dairy Science,97,6991-7000.
[16] Chang, C.Y. and Chiang, S.H. 2005. Antioxidant Properties of Caseins and Whey Proteins from Colostrums. Journal of Food and Drug Analysis, 13, 57-63.
[17] Windayani, N., Turniati, T., & Listiawati, M. 2019. Psychochemical and organoleptic characteristics of colostrum kefir as antibacterial. Journal of Physics: Conf. Series, 1175, 1–6
[18] Chae, A., Aitchison, A, Day, A., S. and Keenan, J.I. 2017. bovine colostrum demonstrates anti-inflammatory and antibacterial activity in vitro models of intestinal inflammation and infection. Journal of Functional foods, 28, 293-298.
[19] Korhonen, H. Marnila, P. and Gill, H.S.2000. Bovine milk antibodies for health British Journal of Nutrition,84(1), 135-146.
[20] Marnila, P. and Korhonen, H. 2011. Colostrum.In J.W. Fuquay, P.F. Fox & P.L.H. McSweeney (Eds), Encyclopedia of dairy sciences (pp.591-597). London, UK: Academic Press.
[21] Playford, J .2000. Peptide therapy and the gastroenterologist: colostrum and milk-derived growth factors. Clinical Nutrition, 20, 101-106.
[22] Abdel-Ghany, S. and Zaki, D.A. 2018. Production of Novel Functional Yoghurt Fortified with Bovine Colostrum and Date Syrup for Children. Alexandria Science Exchange Journal,39(4),651-662.
[23] Figueroa-Gonzalez, I., Rodriguez-Serrano, G., Gomez-Ruiz, L., Garcia-Garibay, M. and Cruz-Guerrero, A. 2019. Prebiotic effect of commercial saccharides on probiotic bacteria isolated from commercial products. Food Science and Technology, 39(3), 747–753.
[24] Sokolowska, A., Bednarz, R., Pacewicz, M. et al. 2008.Colostrum from different mammalian species-A rich source of colostrinin. International Dairy Journal, 18,204-209.
[25] Tamime, A. Y. and Robinson, R. K.1999. Yoghurt. Science and Technology. London, UK: Wood head publishing, 120-150.
[26] FAO/WHO. 2001. Health and nutritional properties of probiotics in food including powder milk with live lactic acid bacteria. Report of a Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation on Evaluation of Health and Nutritional Properties of Probiotics in Food Including Powder Milk with Live Lactic Acid Bacteria. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
[27] AOAC. 1999. Official methods of analysis (16th edn.). Washington, DC, USA: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.
[28] APHA. 1992. Standard method of examination of dairy products (16th edn.). Washington, DC, USA: American Public Health Association.
[29] AOAC. 2012.Official methods of analysis Association of Official Agricultural Chemists 19th rev. Gaithersburg MD –USA, AOAC.
[30] Keogh, M.K. and O Kennedy, B.T. 1998. Rheology of stirred yogurt as affected by added milk fat, protein, and hydrocolloids. Journal of Food Science, 63, 108-112.
[31] Windayani, N., Turniati, T. and Listiawati, M. 2019. Phychochemical and organoleptic characteristics of colostrum kefir as antibacterial. Journal of Physics: Conf. Series, 1175, 1–6.
[32] Saito, T. 2004. Selection of useful probiotic lactic acid bacteria from the Lactobacillus acidophilus group and their applications to functional foods. Animal Science Journal, 75, 1-13.
[33] Ayar, A., Sıçramaz, H. and Çetin, İ. 2016. The effect of bovine colostrum on the lactic flora of yogurt and kefir. JSM Biotechnology and Biomedical Engineering, 3,4, 1063-1069.
[34] Vasiljevic, T., Kealy, T. and Mishra, V. K. 2007. Effects of β-glucan addition to a probiotic containing yogurt. Journal of Food Science, 72(7), 405–411.
[35] Saad, N., Delattre, C. and Urdaci, M. 2013. An overview of the last advances in probiotic and prebiotic field. LWT-Food Sci Technol, 50, 1-16.
[36] Schorsch, C., Wilkins, D. K., Jones, M. G., & Norton I. A. N. T. 2001. Gelation of casein-whey mixtures: effects of heating whey proteins alone or in the presence of casein micelles. Journal of Dairy Research. 63(3),471-481.
[37] Lucey, J.A., Munro, P.A. and Singh, H. 1999. Effects of heat treatment and whey protein addition on the rheological properties and structure of acids skim milk gels. Int. Dairy J. 9, 275-282.
[38] Du, B., Li, J., Zhang, H., Chen, P., Huang, L. and Zhou, J.2007. The stabilization mechanism of acidified milk drinks induced by carboxymethylcellulose. Lait. 87(4-5), 287-300.
[39] Janhoj, T., Blangsted, P., Boom Frost, M. and Ipsen, R.2006. Sensory and rheological characterization of low-fat stirred yogurt. Journal of Texture Studies.37(3), 276-299.
[40] Villegas, B., Tarrega, A., Carbonell, I. and Costell E.2010. Optimizing acceptability of new prebiotic low-fat milk beverages. Food Quality Preference, 21,234–242.
[41] Dzik, S., Micinski, B., Aitzhanova, I., Micinski, J., Pogorzelska, J., Beisenov, A. et al. 2017. Properties of bovine colostrum and the possibilities of use. Polish Annals of Medicine, 24, 295-299.
[42] Korhonen, H. J. 2012. Production and properties of health-promoting proteins and peptides from bovine colostrum and milk. Cellular and Molecular Biology, 58(1), 26–38.
[43] Giangolini, G. and De Marchi, M. 2018. Short communication: Phenotypic characterization of total antioxidant activity of buffalo, goat, and sheep milk. Journal of Dairy Science, 101(6), 4864–4868.
[44] Gandhi, A., and Shah, N. 2014. Cell growth and proteolytic activity of Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus helveticus, Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus, and Streptococcus thermophiles in milk as affected by supplementation with peptide fractions. InternationalJournal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, 65(8), 937–941.
[45] Ozcan, T., Sahin, S., Akpinar-Bayizit, A. and Yilmaz-Ersan, L. 2018. Assessment
of antioxidant capacity by method comparison and aminoacid characterization in buffalo milk kefir. International Journal of Dairy Technology,72(1), 67–73.