Journal of food science and technology(Iran)

Journal of food science and technology(Iran)

A Comparative Study on the Effects of Nano- and Microplastics on Nutrient Element Accumulation and Physiological Performance in Arugula (Eruca sativa L.): Implications for Food Crop Safety

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Department of Biology, College of Education, Samarra University
2 2. Department of Biotechnolog. College of Applied Science . Samarra University
3 3. Assistant Lecturer at Northern Technical University / Technical Institute Al-Dour.
10.48311/fsct.2026.119316.83062
Abstract
Plastic pollution in irrigation water poses an emerging threat to agricultural systems. This study compared the effects of nanoplastics (NPs, 248 nm) and microplastics (MPs, 34 μm) on arugula (Eruca sativa L.) exposed to 10–100 mg/L concentrations justified by Tigris River contamination modeling. Plants were cultivated for 65 days in controlled chambers; particle characterization employed Py-GC/MS, μ-Raman, TEM-EDS, and confocal microscopy. Nitrogen was quantified by Kjeldahl digestion, and other minerals were quantified by ICP-OES. Statistical analysis used linear mixed-effects models with Benjamini–Hochberg correction. Nanoplastics induced greater nutrient depletion than microplastics: at 100 mg/L, nitrogen declined 50.9% (NP) vs. 37.3% (MP), iron 55.4% (NP) vs. 34.8% (MP) (P < 0.001). Oxidative stress markers (H₂O₂, MDA) increased 189% and 201% under NP vs. 156% and 168% under MP (P < 0.001). Although MP root accumulation (42.4 mg/kg) exceeded NP accumulation (14.4 mg/kg) threefold, NPs proved more phytotoxic. Subcellular imaging revealed NP penetration into chloroplasts and mitochondria; MPs remained extracellular. Fresh biomass declined 58.2% (NP) vs. 41.7% (MP) (P < 0.001). Antioxidant enzyme upregulation was stronger under NP exposure but insufficient to prevent oxidative damage. These findings demonstrate that nanoplastics pose a greater physiological threat to arugula than microplastics through organellar penetration and cellular dysfunction, despite lower tissue accumulation. Results highlight the urgent need to incorporate nano-scale particles into irrigation water quality standards and treatment technologies.
Keywords
Subjects

[1]     Mamun SA, et al. Global plastic production and environmental persistence: a contemporary assessment. Environ Pollut. 2023;325:121393.
 [2]     de Souza Machado AA, Kloas W, Zarfl C, Hempel S, Rillig MC. Microplastics as an emerging threat to terrestrial ecosystems. Glob Chang Biol. 2018;24:1405–16.
 [3]     Frias JPGL, Nash R. Microplastics: finding a consensus on the definition. Mar Pollut Bull. 2019;138:145–7.
 [4]     Nihart A, et al. Accumulation of plastic particles in human tissues: a 2016–2024 temporal analysis. J Hazard Mater. 2025;476:135912.
 [5]     Junhao C, et al. Sources and distribution of microplastics in agricultural soils: a review. Chemosphere. 2021;280:130796.
 [6]     Chang H, Ma Y, Jiang J, Yan Y, Tang Z, Mao W, Wang G, Dong J, Zhao W, Gao X, Li X. Plasticizer contamination in irrigation water: residue characteristics and toxic effects of DBP and DEHP on wheat growth and metabolism. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2025;301:118510.
 [7]     Tursi A, et al. Microplastics in aquatic systems: origination, accumulation, impact, and removal technologies. RSC Adv. 2022;12:28318–40.
 [8]     Herforth A, et al. Global vegetable consumption recommendations and public health implications. Lancet Planet Health. 2019;3:e318–29.
 [9]     Zhou J, et al. Polystyrene nanoplastics accumulate at root junctions and enter vascular tissues of lettuce. Sci Total Environ. 2023;857:159362.
 [10]  Qiu Y, et al. ROS-induced oxidative stress as a primary mechanism of nanoplastic phytotoxicity. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2022;186:1–10.
 [11]  Gao M, et al. Lipid peroxidation and DNA damage in plants exposed to polystyrene nanoplastics. Chemosphere. 2019;233:423–30.
 [12]  Roy R, Hossain A, Sultana S, Deb B, Ahmod MM, Sarker T. Microplastics increase cadmium absorption and impair nutrient uptake and growth in red amaranth (Amaranthus tricolor L.) in the presence of cadmium and biochar. BMC Plant Biol. 2024;24(1):1–14.
 [13]  Gao X, et al. Subcellular localization and organellar penetration of nanoplastics in plant cells. J Hazard Mater. 2023;445:130540.
 [14]  Khan AR, Ulhassan Z, Li G, Lou J, Iqbal B, Salam A, et al. Micro/nanoplastics: critical review of their impacts on plants, interactions with other contaminants, and management strategies. Sci Total Environ. 2024;912:169420.
 [15]  Bajguz A, Carillo P, editors. Impact of cadmium stress on growth and physio-biochemical attributes of Eruca sativa Mill. Plants. 2022;11(21):2981.
 [16]  Mwamba TM, Islam F, Ali B, Lwalaba JLW, Gill RA, Zhang F, et al. Comparative metabolomic responses of low- and high-cadmium accumulating genotypes reveal the cadmium adaptive mechanism in Brassica napus. Chemosphere. 2020;250:126308.
[17]  Lichtenthaler HK. Chlorophylls and carotenoids: pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. Methods Enzymol. 1987;148:350–82.
 [18]  Velikova V, Yordanov I, Edreva A. Oxidative stress and some antioxidant systems in acid rain-treated bean plants: protective role of exogenous polyamines. Plant Sci. 2000;151(1):59–66.
 [19]  Hodges DM, DeLong JM, Forney CF, Prange RK. Improving the thiobarbituric acid-reactive-substances assay for estimating lipid peroxidation in plant tissues containing anthocyanin and other interfering compounds. Planta. 1999;207(4):604–11.
 [20]  Giannopolitis CN, Ries SK. Superoxide dismutases: I. Occurrence in higher plants. Plant Physiol. 1977;59(2):309–14.
 [21]  Aebi H. Catalase in vitro. Methods Enzymol. 1984;105:121–6.
 [22]  R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2023
[23]  Jambeck JR, Geyer R, Wilcox C, Siegler TR, Perryman M, Andrady A, Narayan R, Law KL. Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science. 2015;347(6223):768–71.