Effect of ultrasonic pretreatments and process condition on mass transfer rate during osmotic dehydration of orange slices

Authors
1 MSc Student, Department of Food Science and Technology, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Food Science and Technology, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Food Science and Technology, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran
Abstract
The intensity and application time of ultrasound treatment before the osmotic dehydration process and the use of osmotic solutions of different concentrations can result in different dehydration intensities and sucrose gain in the orange slices and also can influence important qualitative parameters. In this research, the effect of ultrasound pretreatments (three levels of ultrasound intensity and at three different times) and the sucrose solution concentration (20, 30, and 40%) on the weight loss percentage, the solid gain percentage, the amount of removed moisture and the rehydration percentage of orange slices during osmotic dehydration process was investigated. By increasing the concentration of sucrose solution from 20 to 40%, the solid gain percentage of dehydrated orange slices increased from 7.94% to 16.29% (P<0.05); But with increase in the sonication power from zero to 150 W, the value of this parameter decreased. By increasing the sucrose solution concentration from 20 to 40%, due to the increase in the osmotic pressure of the solution, the amount of weight reduction and the moisture loss percentage of orange slices increased from 5.17% to 10.58% and from 13.11% to 27.14%, respectively. With increasing the ultrasound treatment time, the amount of removed moisture from the samples increased (P<0.05). With increasing ultrasound power, the rehydration of dried samples increased from 169.9% to 186.2%, but the ultrasound time had the opposite influence, and with increasing the ultrasound treatment time, the rehydration amount of samples decreased from 181.5% to 168.9%. In general, applying 5 min of ultrasound with a power of 150 W, due to the reduction of solid gain and increase in rehydration percentage, is recommended before the osmotic dehydration process of orange slices with a solution containing 40% sucrose.
Keywords

Subjects


[1] Salehi, F. 2021. Recent applications of heat pump dryer for drying of fruit crops: A review, International Journal of Fruit Science. 21, 546-555.
[2] Kaur, D., Singh, M., Zalpouri, R., Singh, I. Osmotic dehydration of fruits using unconventional natural sweeteners and non-thermal-assisted technologies: A review, Journal of Food Processing and Preservation. e16890.
[3] Deepika, S., Sutar, P. P. 2017. Osmotic dehydration of lemon (Citrus limon L.) slices: Modeling mass transfer kinetics correlated with dry matter holding capacity and juice sac losses, Drying Technology. 35, 877-892.
[4] Salehi, F. 2022. Recent advances in the ultrasound-assisted osmotic dehydration of agricultural products: A review, Food Bioscience. 102307.
[5] Azizi Khesal, M., Bassiri, A., Maghsoudlu, Y. 2013. Optimization of combined pulsed vacuum osmotic dehydration – hot air drying of orange slices by response surface methodology, Food Technology & Nutrition. 10, 63-72.
[6] Salehi, F. 2020. Physico-chemical properties of fruit and vegetable juices as affected by ultrasound: A review, International Journal of Food Properties. 23, 1748-1765.
[7] Azarpazhooh, E., Sharayeei, P., Gheybi, F. 2019. Evaluation of the effects of osmosis pretreatment assisted by ultrasound on the impregnation of phenolic compounds into aloe vera gel and dry product quality, Food Engineering Research. 18, 143-154.
[8] Awad, T. S., Moharram, H. A., Shaltout, O. E., Asker, D., Youssef, M. M. 2012. Applications of ultrasound in analysis, processing and quality control of food: A review, Food Research International. 48, 410-427.
[9] Amjadi, S., Alizadeh, A., Roufegarinejad, L. 2018. Cavitation effects of sonication on microbial load and physicochemical properties of orange juice, Journal of Food Science and Technology (Iran). 15, 217-226.
[10] Fernandes, F. A., Gallão, M. I., Rodrigues, S. 2008. Effect of osmotic dehydration and ultrasound pre-treatment on cell structure: Melon dehydration, LWT-Food Science and Technology. 41, 604-610.
[11] Salehi, F., Cheraghi, R., Rasouli, M. 2022. Influence of sonication power and time on the osmotic dehydration process efficiency of banana slices, Journal of Food Science and Technology (Iran). 19, 197-206.
[12] Samie, A., Ghavami Jolandan, S., Zaki Dizaji, H., Hojjati, M. 2019. The effect of osmotic and ultrasonic pre-treatments on the quality of strawberry drying process in hot air drying method, Iranian Journal of Biosystems Engineering. 50, 705-715.
[13] Azoubel, P. M., da Rocha Amorim, M., Oliveira, S. S. B., Maciel, M. I. S., Rodrigues, J. D. 2015. Improvement of Water Transport and Carotenoid Retention During Drying of Papaya by Applying Ultrasonic Osmotic Pretreatment, Food Engineering Reviews. 7, 185-192.
[14] Sharifi, M., Rafiei, S., Keyhani, A., Omid, M. 2010. Drying of orange and selection of a suitable thin layer drying model, 41, 61-67.
[15] Kheyabani, S., Ghanbarzadeh, B., Hoseini, M. 2021. Effect of antioxidant active coatings on osmotic dehydration efficiency and quality parameters of Shahroodi dried grape, Journal of Food Research. 31, 51-63.
[16] Abbasi Seydabad, V., Shaffafi Zonozian, M., Irani, M. 2011. Osmotic dehydration monitoring of quince through salt, sucrose and glucose osmotic solutions, Journal of Innovation in Food Science and Technology. 3, 39-49.